Monday, June 10, 2024

TODAY'S EPIPHANY

 CHOICES

It’s difficult to choose one side unconditionally these days. I’ve always leaned left, but don’t always subscribe to the silliness. Yes, no offense, but there are some silly things going on ‘die äußerste Linke,” way over yonder. This “pronoun crap” in my opinion, is silly. This “I don’t feel safe hearing an opinion I disagree with” is silly. This stopping traffic while innocent people are trying to get to work, to the hospital, or home to their children is beyond silly.

Every sports coach knows that one never makes a statement that the opposing coach will tack to the locker room walls to motivate players. Think how many votes Donald Trump received just from “defund the police.”

But, to allegorize something Sigmund Freud probably never said but got stuck with, “Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.”

Silliness is just silliness. Unproductive actions are just unproductive actions. Extreme “wokeism” is just extreme wokeism. People don't normally die from them.

Making a 12-year-old girl give birth to a rapist’s sperm residue is more than silliness.

Attacking the police guarding the United State Capitol is more than just silliness.

Defunding programs that feed the poor is more than just silliness.

Persecuting someone because of their genetic wiring for sex is more than just silliness.

Decisions stem from points along a spectrum of reality. At one end are rainbow flags. At the other are crematorium ovens.

Sunday, June 9, 2024

A New Epiphany

 PASSWORDS

Yesterday’s Epiphany: It can’t be the economy. Most folks are doing well enough, and many are doing quite well. The job I first went to work for earning $400 per month now starts at around $65,000 per year. No, I just think there’s an uneasy feeling pervading America, a sense that something is wrong, and disaster is imminent.

As the Nazis rose to power, there had been major hard times in Germany: inflation, stagnation, poverty, and even starvation. They felt Hitler had led, and would continue to lead, the country out of the mess.

In America today, they don’t have a past crisis to build upon. But wait, what if they could convince people that there are, indeed, hard times upon us and worse times to come? Then they could march out a charlatan who only had to babble about blaming others and making things better. A mindset built on lies is as firm as one built on truth. People are malleable.

Take the Baby Boomers for example. (I’m not technically one. I was a “don’t draft me” baby but the BBs accept me.) Now what upsets me and my cohort?

Passwords.

Yes, passwords. I’m suffering a primal despair over them. I’ve suffered from demands for them for years and I’m even running out of ideas. I must even furnish one to pay a bill when I would rejoice at the thought of a hacker paying it for me.

So, I hate passwords and suffer a love-hate relationship with modern technology.

Passwords. Damn them.

I don’t, though, blame Joe Biden for them.

But wait.

Say I watched Fox “news” for seven or eight hours per day. And what if that deplorable institution used the time to pound it into me that Joe Biden invented and promotes, even mandates, passwords.

Soon, I’d be speaking neo-German with the rest of The Cult.


Wednesday, June 5, 2024

An Alarming Epiphany

 AN ALARMING EPIPHANY

After working my way through Steven Plinker’s “Blank Slate” and following his recommendation to “The Nurture Assumption” by Judith Rich Harris, I’ve come to the unsettling conclusion that our actions depend, for the most part, on evolutionary psychology. Exhaustive research finds no demonstrable impact by the home. It explains so much, like how the military can turn average young people into raging warriors with a few weeks of manipulation. More alarmingly, it explains why people I once knew as caring, compassionate, and thoughtful individuals now embrace a culture of hatred, violence, and cult obedience.

We don’t have to take people forward, just help them step backwards toward the evolutionary psychology of tribalism, xenophobia, and violence. Going back is a much easier task than going forward. What we call moral improvement or the advance of civilization consists of difficult and slippery reciprocal agreements:

  • We won’t attack your village if you won’t attack ours.
  • We'll leave your property alone if you leave ours alone.
  • We won't try to kill you if you don't try to kill us.

We achieve harmony not through some quest for righteousness but through actions that move us away from our primitive nature and toward a stable environment. Unsettling, but enlightening.

Thursday, January 18, 2024

 THE PASSING OF THE PAST


She thought. As usual, she had to work hard at it. Today, though, she applied additional diligence. It was important. She stared, but saw little, just jerky thought-images rolling by like frames in an ancient film strip. She listened, but heard only long-dead voices. It was beginning to prepare to start.

Her mind settled on a time during her childhood when her daddy’s brother and his family would visit on Saturday nights. Every week they came. It never failed, for life followed a more predictable path in those days. The car would stop. The horn would honk. Then the whole bunch of relatives would pile into the house. On those evenings, the women talked, the kids played, and the men drank beer in the basement. Meanwhile, Time, that stealer of dreams, notched another week onto the tally-pole of life.

Around ten, the women began to listen. If she tried, she could remember why they listened. The men would begin to sing a parody of the song Sweet Adeline. When they reached, “your feet stink just like mine,” the women would nod to one another and move to the door leading to the basement. The kids would pick up any scattered toys and store them away like memories that were no longer useful. All was predictable.

While the women retrieved their men, the kids would bound up the stairs and take turns sliding down the banister. Down they would come, and then race back to the top for another turn, over and over until the order came to stop.

She hated to hear the stop for she had always supposed the other kids did it because they enjoyed the experience of speed. She enjoyed it for a different reason, having found at an early age that it felt good in a way she didn’t quite understand, that is, if she wore a loose-fitting skirt that allowed more-or-less direct contact. She sometimes played banister riding when she was alone in the house, using a personal technique that was much slower than the Saturday night rides. It made for an even nicer experience.

One day, the ride took her somewhere she had never been, took her someplace special that was hers and hers alone. She loved going there and never came all the way back. Not long after that, a shower nozzle performed the same task. The opportunities multiplied, and she soon found other ways. Was she afflicted or something? She didn’t understand, but thought it best not to tell anyone, especially the priest. That much was for sure.

Well, she had told Jeremy much later, but he was special—young, married, noncommittal Jeremy was just what a lively woman hoped for in life. He posed no threat to her and called what they did “sport-fucking.” That sounded jolly to her, and she didn’t mind teaching him a thing or two, hence the confession about the banister rides. She smiled. Jeremy was sweet and belonged with her in that special place.

She had even taught him the importance of foreplay, though that sharing of expertise had unintended consequences when he got too good at it, and things would start moving far faster than she preferred. Things were doing that now as well. Back then, she would whisper in his ear, “Slow down. Be still for a minute,” although it never worked. He would try his best to be motionless, but the slightest twitch kicked her into action. She would arch her back and scream while her legs locked around him and held him in place. He had better, by God, hold on for dear life at that moment … stay in the saddle, so to speak. Good times, overall. She smiled again from simply thinking about it. Jeremy was special and life offers too few special things. But she had helped Jeremy get a promotion and that took him away. Plus, she hadn’t told him everything.

She hadn’t told him, for example, about what she thought of as her “near-black” experience. He was a man who came on to her in a bar where she sat on a stool wearing one of what she and Emma called their “easy-access skirts,” in this case access for roving hands and not bannisters. She was younger then and looking for new things, not things to write home about, mind you, just things to file away and recall later, at times like this. Special things.

Back then, a tumble in the parking lot with a handsome man seemed promising. “Sexperience-gathering,” she called it. He seemed nice, he smelled good, and he had a big car and money, far more good points than the typical man could claim. There was room in the car to accomplish any number of new ideas, and she had always been goal-oriented. The size of the car meant she could move around a bit if the mood struck her. But after a long period of tasting tongue, lips, and ebony skin, accompanied by some skillful rubbing, she found size could be a deterrent as well.

She had, years later, told someone about this: her friend Emma, who shared her taste in skirts as well has her taste in men. Emma knew how to keep secrets, and besides, they both knew enough about one another to ensure silence. Emma’s eyes had grown wide when she heard, “it was as long as a sausage and as big around as a tomato juice can. I had to run, leaving him there holding it while I hopped, skipped, and jumped away, pulling my drawers up as I went. I’m going to call it my ‘easy-escape skirt’ from now on.” But even now on lonely nights, she wishes she had stayed on track and rode it through.

She and Emma both laughed about it. That, of course, was the last time she had seen Emma laugh.

She smiled again. But then she thought of children and stopped smiling. They promised her no joy in life. She found them self-centered and grasping. She read somewhere that the human species had such a long gestation period that the final years of embryonic development had to be accomplished outside the womb. She found it could last much longer than that. It wasn’t unusual, she had observed, for it to last into adulthood for families who could afford it. For those who couldn’t, there was the military or the penal system. Either way liberated the parents, and she was happy for them. Let anyone blame her. Fuck them all.

She forced her thoughts away from children and into the further past and memories of “the big nasty,” as they called it back then. She held out until she was 15, almost, then she had gotten around to it at a secluded lake house after a dance. Afterwards, she wasn’t sure it was worth all the anticipation. The boy had spoiled the moment by promising her they would be married. She would work while he went to college. He would come home, tell her what college was like, and they would marry. Then, he solemnly announced, she would have sex with him, and only him, every night, pretty much forever. Forever?

That had almost clamped her thighs together for good. But, it was difficult at that age to arrange a night free from parental surveillance, so she had gone ahead and tried it. It wasn’t too bad, not as good as a long spell with the banister, but not too bad. Best thing was: it had given her a taste for more. Therein lay the value, she supposed.

They stuck the name “whipper” on her in high school, or, more precisely, “whupper,” as one of her classmates, a boy from the South, phrased it. She shook her head when she thought about this. It wasn’t fair, not a bit. It was the first time, but not the last, in her life that she would face that reality. She hadn’t really done the deed that spawned the name. She had spurned a date’s advances because he smelled bad, and he had started the rumor in retaliation. It stuck, and every boy she went out with afterwards expected the mythical privilege. None were successful but idle talk will suffocate reality any day of the week. She learned later that the lie even stuck to her younger sister like a malignant, life-sucking slime. “Whupper Junior,” they called her. She had taught them, though.

She then realized that men start out stupid and get worse. They could be useful, but that was about it. If reality could provide them a thousandth part of the sexual escapades that locker-room talk did, they might improve, or that’s how she had always felt about it. Meanwhile, they could always be on tap, and sometimes on top if she felt like it. That was it as far as she was concerned. High school days ended in disappointment.

She grew up quick and learned to be picky. In college, a boy who could be patient and take instruction was good for at least five dates. No more. Any more would get them to thinking awful thoughts, sometimes with the word “love” growing from an otherwise pleasant conversation like a weed slithering out of the ground in a garden. That made them forget the things she had taught them, and she didn’t like that. She liked a boy who could learn, utilize what he had learned, and move on to make room for another. They were always free—the boys—to pass along what they had learned to the other girls. She was charitable in that way.

It was a way of repaying life for granting her such special gifts.

Thinking about these things right now, she touched herself, in an “inappropriate manner” as the nuns used to call it, just to calm down a bit. The warm memories of the banister rides had ruined any chances for true peace. Funny how memories worked. That made her think of the day one of her husbands had confessed that the reason he failed, so often, to perform was that he would be haunted by memories of his first wife. That’s when she quit believing in a god that could create, and allow the continuation of, the male of the species for any purpose other than a woman’s casual pleasure. Who could blame her for feeling that way?

“College boys were the worst,” she was thinking now. Had computers been more advanced at the time, they would probably have had a sexual version of “fantasy football.” They could form imaginary harems and vie for digital prominence. “Fantasy Fucking.” Why not?

Most men proved unredeemable. Kurt had been different. Kurt had been nice. He taught her some things involving ice cubes, for example. She had once ensnared a man who had loads of money with the ice cube technique Kurt called “frosty balls.” That particular man was special because he lavished money on her and took a long time to understand what was happening.

Remembering Kurt, though, made her think again about the bannisters. Then she silently hoped that Allah, or whichever god was to blame, withheld the virgins from the son-of-a-bitch who ended Kurt’s further quest for mastery of the sexual act. She allowed her mind to drift back, and when she saw no one was watching, she folded her pillow, crammed it between her legs, and pretended that it was Kurt’s head. She stopped and jerked it away when she recalled that they had never found his head. They never found his head but his family had sent her his dog tags and medals. They didn't want them. She lost them in the most recent fire.

She felt her eyes begin to swell. “Damn it all to hell,” she thought. She moved the pillow back behind her, rested on it, and closed her eyes.

She was dreaming of bannisters when she heard a voice calling to her, “Mrs. Adams, it’s time.”

Tuesday, October 3, 2023

 GEORGE MEADE, THE VIETS, AND ME

By Jimmie von Tungeln

     October 3, 2023

        I can’t provide one. [An explanation foer the lack of appreciation] What I can do is recite my path toward understanding how the stories are entwined. No doubt there are other unappreciated individuals or groups who have endured the misfortunes of history’s spotted chronicles. England’s Alan Turing comes to mind as do the men and women of color and same-sex orientation who served our country through its wars only to face discrimination and prejudice at home. I can’t speak for them. But I can speak for the Viets with some degree of authority. And I will try to provide some solace to the neglected personage of George Meade.

        Take the Viets, for example. Few people in the 1960s or 1970s would have publicly condemned them. That would have required a reason, an explanation, or even a verifiable fact. In my personal experience the enmity was personal, casual, and multifaceted. It included:

-          The band of protesters who met our plane at the San Bernadino, California airport upon our arrival home from the war.

-          The airline representative who told me, with distaste in his demeanor, that the baggage (seabags) of “you people” wasn’t processed with those of normal people but was shuttled to a fenced bin three flights of stars below the main course.

-          The veterans’ associations that didn’t want “losers” as members.

-          The personnel officer on the ship to which I was assigned on my return who bragged, “I always give those Vietnam vets the shittiest assignment we have in order to put them in their place.”

-          The job interviewer who suggested I might omit my military service from my application.

-          The myriad Americans who accepted the stereotype of my brothers and sisters as drug-crazed sociopaths.

-          The book, film, and TV producers, even including some Viets, who clung to the stereotype of misfits who could not function in or after stressful actions.

      In fairness, both General Meade and the Viets generated some of this animosity. I’ll cover that in a later section. For now, may we just say that all had a right to expect better treatment?



[i] Catton, Bruce. “Grant Takes Command.”


Saturday, September 30, 2023

GEORGE MEADE, THE VIETS, AND ME

By Jimmie von Tungeln

September 30, 2023

After beginning my study of the battle, intrigue led me to the National Parks service. The service maintains a web site on the battle of Gettysburg. I went there to find out more about this man Meade. If any site should direct my study, this one should.

      At that time, the effort met with failure and surprise. The National Park Website on the Gettysburg Battlefield Park did not mention General George G. Meade whatsoever. Instead, it concentrated on, as might be expected, Robert E. Lee. It also featured prominently a rebel division commander, George E. Pickett. The latter’s division was present for only one day of the battle, Being a fresh unit, it took part, with two other divisions, in the most spectacular failure of the battle. More on that later. Having enjoyed a 100-year publicity campaign by historical revisionists, that rebel general now represents America’s most famous, yet beloved, loser.

      As for the forgotten General Meade, Allen C. Guelzo summoned it well in a 2013 essay republished in 2017:

      “And yet the mention of Meade has always been met with a certain degree of pause—surprise that an officer with such modest credentials could manage to pull off such a mammoth victory as Gettysburg, and then chirping criticism that, having triumphed as he did, Meade failed to do more, failed to stop Lee from escaping back into Virginia and thus end the Civil War right there and then. Although both of those reactions are unfair, they are also accurate. And together, they have come to define George Gordon Meade’s long-term reputation.”[i]

      At the time of this writing, the NPS website on the battlefield treats Meade with more deference, a sign of a growing but grudging acceptance of the man’s remarkable performance. That it has taken a century and a half for such redemption seems regrettable, but is welcome, nonetheless.

      Age has resulted in the most beneficial catalyst for the Viets. At this time, they have become too “long in the tooth” to play ubiquitous crazed psychopaths, lost souls, or deranged superheroes—sometimes a bit of each. Those are roles they filled for years in film, TV, and modern literature. Oh, they stand in on occasion as the most despicable in a clan of despicables, usually southerners or actors attempting to portray southerners. These days they mostly appear as old men with funny caps who wander the streets dreaming of lost love and “lid bags.”

      As Scott Cooper expressed in it a piece for the Modern War Institute at West Point in 2021:

      “In Vietnam the troops lost their noble and heroic image. To others, they were baby killers and suckers. The stereotype of the US soldiers in the war were the goons who perpetrated the atrocities of My Lai, or the blue-collared Boston Southies who didn’t have the connections to get out of the draft. And the result is a generation of combat veterans perceived as products of a single mold, one that gave us James Webb and John Rambo—that of the aggrieved warrior.”[ii]

      All parties, General Meade and the Viets, wander through history with their images drawn to whatever viewpoint correlates highly with an individual viewpoint. Like the nautical Flying Dutchman, their true legacy has never found a safe harbor.



[i] Guelzo, Allen C. “George Meade’s Mixed Legacy,” Historynet, 2017 https://www.historynet.com/george-meades-mixed-legacy/

[ii] AFTER VIETNAM, AMERICAN SOCIETY’S RELATIONSHIP WITH ITS MILITARY WAS BADLY FRAYED. AFTER TWENTY YEARS OF POST-9/11 WARS, IT IS AGAIN. Scott Cooper


[i] AFTER VIETNAM, AMERICAN SOCIETY’S RELATIONSHIP WITH ITS MILITARY WAS BADLY FRAYED. AFTER TWENTY YEARS OF POST-9/11 WARS, IT IS AGAIN. Scott Cooper

Friday, September 29, 2023

 

GEORGE MEADE, THE VIETS, AND ME

By Jimmie von Tungeln

 Prologue

It takes a Vietnam veteran to understand the lack of appreciation America has paid the victor of the country's most famous battle. That would be the Battle of Gettysburg, fought on the first three days of July 1863. The general would be Maj. Gen. George Gordon Mead. If you’ve never heard of him, don’t worry, most Americans haven’t. A majority of those who do are ones who never forgave him for his monumental act of temerity. His army won the battle, if an army can ever “win” a battle. And he was to blame for it.

      Who was he to defeat the undefeatable Robert E. Lee? Lee was then the rebellion’s darling, later to become an American favorite, second only to George Washington. How could he have been bested by someone named Meade, days before only an unknown Corps commander in the U.S. Army? Americans don’t easily forgive those who fail to live up to their mythical dogmas. Nor do they embrace those who destroy their most cherished fantasies.

      General Meade paid dearly for his transgressions. A later generation would suffer in kind. The difference? Meade earned his historical displeasure for a victory. Veterans of the police action in Southeast Asia earned theirs for a defeat. In both cases unpopular figures shattered myths. We don’t like that. We don’t allow it. We stop it when we can with whatever means are available.

      Meade paid with historical neglect, ridicule, and outright prevarication. Vietnam veterans, we’ll call them “Viets,” paid with the forfeiture of their valor, of which there was more than the public at large would admit. In both cases, the damage proved irresolute.

      Victims fell under the spell of stubborn myths. The so-called “Lost Cause Myth,” some now call it the “Loser Cause Myth,” not only destroyed reputations, it destroyed the lives of fellow Americans for more than a century. It even clings to its evil purposes in modern times. Malicious, but talented, artists, like D.W. Griffith and  Margaret Mitchell, helped shunt generations of African-Americans into ghettos, substandard schools, and labor that barely provided sustenance. Powerful leaders like Woodrow Wilson stood by, sometimes idly and sometimes not. Myths feed on it all: adherence, acceptance, and indifference.

      Viets also fell under the grinding spell of myths. Drug-crazed, spoiled brats in no way deserved the war flags of “The Greatest Generation.” Yes, that’s the one that forced its brothers of color to come home after the war to ghettos, substandard schools, and labor that barely provided sustenance. More recently, the Viets are enjoying some relief from the myth of “They could have won if the leaders had allowed them to,” a laughable tenant were it not so poetically alluring. Myths feed on it all: absolution, neatly packaged explanations, and ignorance.

      All this swirled about in my mind for years. Personally, I knew the Viets suffered from a bad rap. I had been there. After I decided to study the Gettysburg battle, I began to suspect that George G. Meade deserved more respect than Americans had given him. All he did was take a badly demoralized and undersupplied army, filled with political intrigue and, after only two days in command defeat the immortal Robert E. Lee. The latter, I began to suspect, deserved less respect than America had given him. Myths feed on it all: selective facts, well-crafted falsehoods, and propagation.

To be continued