Lyndon Johnson told the story of a Texas schoolteacher who, faced
with a school board divided on whether the world was round or flat, concluded, “I
can teach it both ways.” That’s how I feel about the current controversy about
removing confederate statutes. That may not be surprising for someone who had great-grandfathers who fought on opposite sides or our Civil War.
On the one hand, I worry that, when we start removing history,
we lose more than we gain. Remember how the Taliban blasted ancient monuments away
as target practice? In the more distant past, after her death in 1457 BC,
Hatshepsut's monuments were attacked, her statues dragged down and smashed, and
her image and titles defaced, information lost—we regret—to future scholars for all
times.
On the other hand, those who find themselves apoplectic over
the removal of statues of Robert E. Lee should read a good history of the United
States and its civil war. Consider then, that there are no statues of Benedict
Arnold in the courthouse squares of America, and no controversy attached to
their absence. Sadly, Robert E. Lee was as dedicated to, and capable of, destroying
our country as it existed in his day as Arnold was in preventing its creation
in his.
Both, as loathe as we may be to admit it, abandoned their
oath to America in order to support her enemies.
I know that Lee is considered by many to be “an honorable man.”
When I first gazed upon the mile of open fields that his troops were ordered
into in the tragic three-division assault on Cemetery Ridge on July 3, 1863, I was no longer sure exactly how he merited that
praise, but so be it. Let us simply try to understand those whose ancestors
were owned by Lee’s wife and over whom he held total authority of life,
punishment, or death. Let us further consider how, according to historian and
author Elizabeth Brown Pryor, he referred to the family’s slave children as “my
ebony-mites.” Is this an American badge of honor?
Were our ancestries different, so might be our feelings.
As a final thought, I primarily regret seeing another
divisive movement settle upon our country like a primal, festering sore. Surely
there is a need: poverty, the abandoned American Delta, collapsing
infrastructure, and the need for decent healthcare for all, that could occupy our attention more productively.
Back to sending 15,000 men toward Cemetery Ridge for the
purpose of preserving the institution of slavery, there have been moments when
much of America wasn’t that great when we recall them. No matter how we may feel, couldn’t we,
instead, recall the beaches of Normandy, and other times when she was?
Perhaps it's an institution that isn't worthy of monuments to its supporters. |
No comments:
Post a Comment