“Get to work or lose your benefits.” What a sentiment. At
what ages, over five and under 70? At what stage of MS, cancer, heart disease,
kidney failure, or other dread disease? Under what burdens of a disadvantaged
childhood? Further, where shall we warehouse the miscreants?
My personal opinion is that Americans sometime make
pronouncements that don’t stand up to rational scrutiny.
The truth is, recognizing the existence of, and caring for,
the poor among us is a profoundly complicated issue. Even the Old Testament can
offer contradictory direction. As Rabbi Jill Jacobs has written: "A striking
feature of [ a passage in Deuteronomy] is the apparent contradiction between
verse four, 'There shall be no needy among you,' and verse eleven, 'For the
poor will never cease from the land.' We expect the omnipotent God of the Torah to keep promises; we are therefore
surprised to hear the Torah promise
to eradicate poverty and then, almost in the same breath, admit that this
promise will never be fulfilled.”
The New Testament
is clearer. The Galilean didn’t have much time for those who valued riches over
honor, exhorting his followers to avoid eternal rejection, in Matthew 25, by
caring for “the least of those among us.” Before that was written, though,
the writer of Second Timothy urged us to be “a worker who needeth not be
ashamed.” The Galilean himself was not kind, though, to the capitalists in the Temple
who were engaged in what would be considered today an exalted and exemplary
profession. It is no wonder that we develop contradictory feelings.
Without doubt, there are those who wish to live upon the
charity of others. In addition those too lazy to work, we must include
corporations and institutions that decline to pay a fair share of taxes, those
who are protected from failure by the public, and even those who are publicly subsidized
for home ownership, (often while voting for politicians who promise to end rental
housing assistance for their poor fellow human beings). It just all fails to
make common sense to me. That is why I must respectfully disagree with some
dear friends whose conclusions are different from mine.
Let us once again turn to Rabbi Jacobs and note what she
writes: “The overarching Jewish attitude toward the poor is best
summed up by a single word of the biblical text: achikha (your brother). With this word, the Torah insists on the
dignity of the poor, and it commands us to resist any temptation to view the
poor as somehow different from ourselves.”
I conclude from my reading and study, that if are to say the
all children must go forth and be self-sufficient and successful or “lose” our
concern and assistance, we are forced into some perilous beliefs. We must believe, for example
that a child in dirty diapers on the front porch of a shack in the Arkansas
Delta, who waits for his mother to finish “turning a trick” for enough cash for
her next meth hit, has the same chance at that self-sufficiency as the children
of Donald Trump.
Believe as you will and serve whom you please. As for me and
my household, we will help the poor whenever we can, and will support a government who
does not abandon them. We don’t do it in hopes of obtaining a heavenly reward in
return. We simply do it because we believe it is the right thing to do as
members of a greater brotherhood and sisterhood: the family of humankind.
We are also touched by a story the Rabbi narrates concerning
a group of passengers in a boat. When one pulls out a drill and begins boring a
hole in the bottom of the boat, to the consternation and complaints of his fellow
passengers, he says, “Why should this bother you? I am only drilling under
my own seat.”
Back to the factories or coal mines? |
No comments:
Post a Comment