While watching a film based on the life if the late
Fred Rogers, yes “the” Mr. Rogers, I couldn’t stop thinking about the Sermon on
the Mount. From what we know of films and biography, few modern Americans lived
a life more in harmony with those words attributed to the Galilean some 2,000
years ago than that simple television star of modern times.
As for us mere mortals, living these demanding scriptures
is difficult in the Facebook age. Just look at the first examples following the
glorious Beatitudes.
“You are the salt of the earth. But if the
salt loses its saltiness, how can it be made salty again? It is no longer good
for anything, except to be thrown out and trampled underfoot. (5:13 NIV)
“You are the light of the world. A town
built on a hill cannot be hidden. Neither do people light a lamp and put it
under a bowl. Instead they put it on its stand, and it gives light to everyone
in the house. 16 In the same way, let your light shine before others, that they
may see your good deeds and glorify your Father in heaven. (5:14-16 NIV)
These constitute the famous “salt and light” sections
of the Sermon. They fall directly upon the listeners and reflect precisely what
the Galilean expects of his followers. They have garnered much attention and
analysis over the years, including opinions regarding just how much light a household
lamp of the era produced. We shan’t go into such detail here. Suffice it to say
that he expected much from us.
Salt is a strange analogy, carrying a dual
function in our physical world. It forms both a necessity of life and flavor to
what may be a bland or troublesome existence. What if we viewed ourselves in
this manner? How would we act if we truly felt that every moment of our waking
life might bring continued hope and a blessing of seasoning to a troubled soul?
Do our posts on social media, for example, reflect such a sublime
responsibility?
Similarly, do we post items in order that our light
may “shine before others,” and reflect our good deeds? The same source quoted
in the Sermon also cautions us about judging others, so we had best limit our analysis
conclusions to our own actions and leave others to their own thoughts.
Let us just conclude that these are troubled times
and the strictures of the Sermon pose huge challenges in compliance. One man
made the effort, though, and there are countless others we could name who have
risen to the challenge. In selecting names, we would surely fail in the test of
inclusion, so let us rest content with the one life mentioned at the beginning.
The Galilean gave his followers a “rough row to
hoe,” as they say in my part of the country. They don’t pose the easiest path to
follow. Maybe as a beginning effort, we can stop short of saying, “What would he
do?” As a more achievable effort, we might just say, “What would Mr. Rogers do?”
He sure made it look easy.
No comments:
Post a Comment