Showing posts with label Betsy DeVoss. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Betsy DeVoss. Show all posts

Saturday, March 31, 2018

Sunrise With Schubert: March 31, 2018


Upon leaving the United States Navy, I landed a provisional job in Little Rock, Arkansas. Problem was, provisional jobs pay very little. Almost nothing. Someone was kind enough to inform me that I was receiving a bit less than secretarial pay.

No problem. I found a cheap, but spacious apartment within walking distance of both the job and the city library. It was much larger than the library on the ship on which I had served, so it allowed me to expand a favorite pastime, reading.

What to read? The writings of T.S. Eliot interested me, so why not? I checked out a copy of his poems and started with The Wasteland. Ouch! It is a troublesome piece, used by generations of professors and mentors to discombobulate arrogant young minds, one belonging to me.

Now Eliot was kind enough to include substantial footnotes as part of the poem, so I checked out some works cited and tackled them.

What on earth, you might say, does that all have to do with the present time?

Well, you see, it’s Easter weekend. That has a lot to do with the topic of so-called “vegetation rituals” so densely treated in wasteland imagery.

It turns out that our ancient ancestors had a few strong beliefs. One was that the Earth exhibited some strange behaviors at times. Another was that it was somehow up to humankind to control such behaviors through various types of magic. And, as alchemy gave birth to scientific investigation, magical attempts at understanding and controlling Earth’s behavior helped give birth to religion.

A prevailing belief was that the Earth died each winter, and it was up to puny humans to revive it. This required great efforts aimed at the rebirth of vegetation. Unfortunately, some of these efforts were quite cruel by today’s standards. The sacrificing of humans as a trade for the rebirth was not uncommon. The giving of a single life for the safety of all became a ubiquitous motif in modern literature.

Hence the beginning of Eliot’s afore-cited work, “April is the cruellest month, breeding lilacs out of the dead land …”

Interesting as well is the claim that Eliot’s working title for the poem was a line, borrowed from Dickens, attributed to a reader of newspapers who was extolling a certain writer, “He do the police in different voices.” There’s hardly a better example of that talent than T.S. Eliot.

Now ain’t that something? Education is such a dear and entertaining friend. One must wonder why such powerful forces seek to destroy it in America. I learned to appreciate it many years ago in a cheap apartment, filled with shabby furniture, in Little Rock, Arkansas. It made me happy then.

It has led me down many a path since. It doesn’t take much to satisfy the yearnings of a young man of limited means with the promise of a full life ahead. Way back then, I learned that joy can be found wherever you are, if you’ll only look for it.



Wednesday, March 14, 2018

Sunrise With Schubert March 14, 2018


It’s hard to respond to a world in which Stephen Hawking is dead and Betsy DeVos is in charge of America’s educational system. Our better angels must weep.

It’s not for Hawking’s contribution to science for which I mourn. He didn’t cure polio, unveil the secrets of nuclear fission, or solve the problem of how we moved from blue algae to a mind like his.. In fact, I hardly begin to understand the things he wrote about. But he will be remembered by history as long as we have a communal history. History will remember him for a life of thinking, imagining, striving to know, and trying make us better through knowledge.

History will remember DeVos as a nobody who spent a millionth of a nanosecond cavorting around on its wrong side with her group of “merry pranksters.”

What saddens me is that Hawking had, in addition to one of history’s great minds, such a sense of humor and charming personality that he made intelligence and education popular.

We will miss that in an age where an entire political party sees its future as flourishing in a sea of dark illiteracy. Where this will lead us is anyone’s guess. A simple extrapolation from the known data would suggest an H. G. Wells world in which hordes of ignorant masses exist only as sustenance for a handful of bloated and careless rulers.

As we mourn the life of Stephen Hawking, will we continue to allow mega-rich families to drag us into a future where the value of a Master’s Degree will be a job as assistant grocery-stacker at Walmart?

We can only hope, as Lewis Mumford said, that “trend is not destiny.”

The death of Stephen Hawking caused me to think, on this sad morning, of a myth I heard once. It involved two travelers crossing the desert with a load a goods. They had bedded their camels for the night when a spirit appeared before them commanding that they empty their cargo and fill the containers with sand.

“If you do this,” the Spirit said, “in the morrow you will both glad and sad.”

Being both fearful of spirits and burdened by greed, the travelers only unloaded a small portion of their goods and replaced them with sand.

In the morning, they found that the sand had turned to precious diamonds and they were indeed glad for them, but sad that they hadn’t loaded more.

That’s how I feel today as I contemplated the life of a Stephen Hawking. I’m glad we had him, but sad that we couldn’t have had more.

If the current leaders of our country prevail, will History look at the shining jewels within America’s story and say, “I’m glad we had her, but I wish we had gathered more?”

A life well spent is a diamond
 in History's crown. - Me

Tuesday, January 2, 2018

Day Two: January 2,

Back in graduate school, I read an article that I can’t find again. Seems that years ago, someone did a piece on slavery in America. Not one of the modern works being put out in schools during the Betsy DeVoss, era, the ones concluding that slavery was simply a matter of guest workers migrating to America in search of jobs. We may survive her and her supporters (some of which our state produced) and we may not. Stay tuned.

No, this was a serious look. It tried, without trivializing the horrors of “that peculiar institution” to present it in terms with which someone who was not of African-American heritage could, at least to a minimal degree, empathize. Of course the search was futile. Although there were those of European descent who came to America as indentured servants or who volunteered once they were here, the comparisons are miniscule. There was no compelling comparison.

The nearest the author(s) could find that approached the lack of human rights, loss of individual freedom, death or corporal punishment without representation, complete control over every waking moment, was … . Are you ready?

The life of a sailor aboard a military ship in the days of sail.

Please, again, don’t take this as a comparison in fact. It is a comparison for contemplation. The most interesting thing was the implication that slavery was a forced, brutal, and closely guarded affair requiring arms and the aid of government to enforce. Oddly, some, not all, sailors chose the life willingly refusing all others. They were the ones Joseph Conrad described as staying at sea for fear that the earth would scorch their feet.” (paraphrase)

I only bring this up because of an article I ran across yesterday that examined the animosity that the working white-class has in America for the working black-class, despite the fact that they have so much in common.

I live in rural state that “thinks poor” as much as it “is poor.” For the last dozen or so statewide elections, the prevalent campaign strategy for some candidates is simply to mail out campaign ads with a picture of Barack Obama on once side and a picture of their opponent on the other. If the opponent was male, the implications were merely designed to appeal to embedded racism. If the candidate was female, the implications were more more horrifyingly meaningful.

Did it work?

Oh yes. Hordes of voters who enjoy 40-hour weeks, social security, unemployment protection, fair labor standards, and, now, health care, flocked to the poles to vote for candidates who support not one of those benefits.

It’s a strange country we live in, and I worry that it’s about to get stranger.

Just thinking …