Codes

People love to put words into the mouth of the Galilean. Some say, after reading the Sermon on the Mount, that he “couldn’t have meant all those things he said. Others say, “well it’s all taken out of context these days.” Still others claim some metaphorical existentialism that shouldn’t be taken literally but maybe as a guide, particularly if you aren’t a Jew.

But anyone would agree that strict adherence to the message of The Sermon would, as they say in the South, be a tough row to hoe.”

So much has been written about what the Galilean said, or meant on that hilltop, that our paltry efforts couldn’t add a scintilla of light on the matter. It may be of interest, though, to note a few things he didn’t mention.

He didn’t say a thing about a man holding hands with another man.

He didn’t say a word about the blessing of hating the same people he hated, nor did he even hint at who that might be.

He didn’t mention any sin associated with caring for others. In fact, he seemed to sanction it.

He didn’t say a thing about blessings that might accrue to those in the crowd if they gave him a denarius or two.

A new jet with which to tool around Judea? Nope

A mansion or two?

Some thousand-denarii suits and matching ties? Nope.

Access to the Emperor? Nope

Well then there now. Which of those modern evangelicals deserves to put words into His Mouth?

Joel Osteen's House.
Better than the Galilean's?

'