Been much talk lately about how such a frightening percentage of Americans accept buffoonery and debauchery from so many of our political leaders. I'm not too smart nor well educated but I have my thoughts. I think an appropriate analogy for the American psyche at present aligns with the old sci-fi films of the 1950s.
Monday, July 14, 2025
DEFEAT FASCISM
Sunday, June 1, 2025
DEFEAT FASCISM
Institutions don’t represent a monolithic community. Consider:
He came from the same America as I.
He enjoyed the same advantages as I.
He went through the same Navy Bootcamp as I.
He took the same oath as I.
He served in the same unit as I. In fact, he often stood
watch in the next outpost. He chowed in the same mess hall as I. He knew
the Vietnamese mothers in the adjacent village craved oranges for some reason connected
with dietetic deficiencies, as did I. He was able to pilfer oranges from daily
meals the same as I.
I would sometimes bring them and pitch them over the
concertina wire to begging mothers wanting them for their babies.
He would taunt them and burst oranges on the street that separated
our compound from the village of Tien Sha.
So when people ask me if I understand that there are Vietnamese
Veterans, just like me, that worship fascism and vote for the most depraved man
ever to run for office in my country, I must say I’m not surprised.
Neither veterans nor alumnae represent monolithic groups
For example: Harvard University graduated:
John Adams
John F. Kennedy
Neil deGrasse Tyson
Barack Obama
T. S. Eliot.
But also:
Ted Kaczynski
Ted Cruz
Tom Cotton
Stephen K. Bannon
Jeffrey Skilling
The religion we call Christianity produced Jimmy Carter and Pope
Francis, but also Jim Bakker and Paula White.
The United States Supreme Court produced Ruth Allen Ginsberg and Clarence Thomas.
Perhaps we should stop seeking validation through groups and look within ourselves. Ideas produced by groups tend to diverge.
Thursday, June 27, 2024
EPIPHANY OF THE DAY
BRIBERY
Years ago, in an Arkansas far away, it was a well-established
situation that a professional services firm wishing to do business—when the contract was governed
by a specific state cabinet agency—would have first to make a “campaign contribution”
to the constitutional head of that agency. It was a dirty but necessary cost of
doing business, one deemed and declared to be legal. How the head of the agency
turned the contribution to personal use was a process that led him to a prison
sentence.
Too bad for him. If the people and process were in operation
today, there is good news. The United States Supreme Court just ruled that it
would be perfectly okay to pay the favor off openly, in cash, and without danger
of indictment as long as the payment occurred after the work was done and not
before.
Only Sam “The Flag” Alito and Clarence “Big Cigar” Thomas could
have developed that logic stream.
There is one catch. That lies in the fact that the public
official must have sufficient trust in the paying party that such emolument can
be delayed until the proper and legal moment. Since the deal can’t be included
in the contract, both sides must trust one another. It could be done with a nod
and wink implying “I know as much on you as you know on me.” In botanical terms,
the leaves must be as rotten as the roots.
In other words, there must be a level of trust not normally
extant in such people.
It has taken awhile, but we are there.
Coda: Supposedly it would work like a "reverse tip." Now if only there were some way it could be made tax deductible.
Tuesday, June 11, 2024
TODAY'S EPIPHANY
LAWYERS
Oh, and part of my feelings for attorneys are mercenary. They
always made sure I got paid for expert testimony. Mostly my feelings stem from
admiration for their knowledge. I might have followed the law, but I thought
all attorneys had to do what Perry Mason did. That image shied me away. The
thought of standing and speaking in public was more terrifying to me than thoughts
of snakes, vampires, sci-fi monsters, or meeting a Catholic nun in the dark.
One of my best friends is an attorney. We jogged many a
morning together and shared thoughts. He is a Harvard Law School grad, so
unlike the venom-spewing Ted Cruz or Tom Cotton that they might be from
different planets. I learned logic, dedication to the law, and concepts of the
advocacy system of jurisprudence from him.
Imagine then, my dismay at the condition of the current
United States Supreme Court. I always imagined it as a pinnacle of dedication, Knowledge,
fairness, and legal righteousness. Along came the current majority. Now I feel as I might have, as a youth, to
find that Roy Rogers, Gene Autry, Red Ryder, Tex Ritter, Lash Larue, and Hopalong Cassidy, were really Nazi spies.
