That’s a question designed for better minds than mine. We
all have our cognitive limits and I certainly do.
But, you may be thinking, "That’s never stopped you before."
True that. So here goes.
If we accept the premise, as I do, that The Sermon is
many things, including a high-level work of art, we notice things about it that
that are consistent with other great works of art. For example, in art, we must
have “an approachable object.” What one does with that object makes a work of
art.
In this case, the Galilean has an opportunity to elevate the
message of righteousness by emphasis, erudition, and expansion. He chose his spot in history
as carefully as Ansel Adams chose his spots on earth, or Rembrandt chose his
faces in the crowd.
Art also offers a range of values, sometimes from pure white
to pure dark. Consider the range of humanity in a great novel, say from
Peggotty to Uriah Heep in Dickens great work, David Copperfield.
The Galilean provides us first with challenge of attitude
that is easy to achieve. Call it the lighter, more doable, segment of his work.
Blessed
are the poor in spirit: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
Blessed
are they that mourn: for they shall be comforted.
Blessed
are the meek: for they shall inherit the earth.
Blessed
are they which do hunger and thirst after righteousness: for they shall be
filled.
Blessed
are the merciful: for they shall obtain mercy.
Blessed
are the pure in heart: for they shall see God.
Blessed
are the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God.
Blessed
are they which are persecuted for righteousness' sake: for theirs is the
kingdom of heaven.
Blessed
are ye, when men shall revile you, and persecute you, and shall say all manner
of evil against you falsely, for my sake.
What could be more simple and straightforward than than
respect for those words? It certainly doesn’t sound, as so many fundamentalists
now claim, that it is taken “out of context.”
He shifts, rather suddenly, to the dark and troublesome exhortations.
Ye have heard that it was said
by them of old time, thou shalt not commit adultery: But I say unto you, that
whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her
already in his heart.
Even a true and great Christian like President Jimmy Carter
admitted to having trouble with that one.
It’s a hard and rocky road to travel, this living by The
Sermon. Maybe that’s why so many people who once led thoughtful and generous
lives now follow the mantra, “I’m with those who hate the same people I do.”
Those are the thoughts that trouble me today. Oh, and yes, I’ve
quoted from the King James version of The Sermon in deference to my
conservative readers who prefer to “read the Scriptures in the original English.”
At any rate, new versions of the Holy Bible ordained by “prosperity-gospel”
preachers and cult-evangelicals will no doubt expunge The Sermon in its entirety. The translation and its demanding strictures may be lost to history. So, I’m
afraid, will our national experiment in social justice for all and care for the "least of those among us" that was so long
in coming, so difficult in endeavor, so righteous in concept, and so violent in denunciation.
No comments:
Post a Comment