Theology Time for the week. Oh dear. I’m still stuck on the
Beatitudes, primarily as recorded by the Gospel writer Matthew as being a part
of the Sermon on the Mount. This is a little-known segment of the Christian New
Testament, largely redacted by the fundamentalist segment of our country—the
so-called Evangelicals. To many “hard-shells,” the ten “blessings” seem more of
an embarrassment than a directive or mandate. We’re stuck with them, though, at
least until the new Bibles come out.
Certainly, our target this week would be an insult to the
likes of Franklin Graham, the latest self-appointed prophet of propriety. It does
appear that the fifth of the Beatitudes represents a case in which the Galilean
stops preaching and starts meddling. Without any apparent embarrassment, he announces,
“Blessed are the merciful: for they shall obtain mercy.” Can’t one just hear
the “Out of Context Crowd” clamoring for the microphone?
Merciful? Oh my goodness. What in the world was he talking about?
It doesn’t appear to be a typo, for it agrees with another directive later in
the same document, "Be merciful, just as your Father is merciful" (Luke
6:36).
Merciful? Who needs it in a world moved to such a degree by
raw hatred of others? Who needs it in a country led by person who begins each
day with digitally transmitted scorn and vitriol published against those who disagree
with him in the slightest?
Merciful? Who needs it in a world where so many condone murderous
executions because of the physiological makeup of a specific persons, amidst
the tacit approval of so many in our own country?
Merciful? I struggle with the concept when I hear people
around me promote the persecution and demeaning of those the Galilean called his
beloved.
Merciful? How does one explain the concept to young children
in a country that builds aircraft carrier after aircraft carrier while healthcare
clinics in its rural areas go broke for lack of funding? (We might come back to
this one later.)
Merciful? How do you explain mercy to a young child of five
who has just been told, and implanted with a primal fear, that a loving old man
in the sky will send their precious bodies to an everlasting pit of fire for the
slightest mishap?
There are those who say, “Oh, we’re fulfilling the ‘merciful’
stricture when we point out to sinners their shortcomings and admonish them
for their evil ways.” They add, “Oh, it is also quite merciful to instruct the uninformed.
What better example of mercy than to interrupt their sinful, albeit peaceful, ignorance and let
them know about the everlasting pit of fire? Now that’s what you call real
mercy.”
The Galilean tells me that he’s not sure about all of this.
People seem to be putting themselves in the position of determining what
constitutes a sin. He thinks they are limiting themselves to the whole concept
of mercy as he sees it, which is to provide succor to those the world deems “the
least,” not the “most.”
Oh, don’t get me wrong. I don’t really talk to the Galilean.
Nor does Franklin Graham. I just read the words he is reported as having said.
I don’t think many others do. Shall we be merciful to them
by pointing out the errors of their ways?
Heck, I guess we’ll have to.
I need to talk to that man. |
No comments:
Post a Comment