Spent yesterday with some of the best folks in the world, a
group of municipal officials from around Arkansas. We were there to teach them
something about urban planning. I think I learned more from them. Here are some of the most interesting topics discussed during breaks and lunch.
A council member from LA told me the most interesting
story. She was in a group interviewing a young lady for a job. It was a typical
interview except for one thing. The girl had her cell phone in between her
hands and was busy texting during the entire interview. Yes, texting. She
listened and answered questions but only stopped texting to look up at the interviewers
once. That was when they told her the hours were from eight to five.
She stopped texting. Looked up, and said with surprise. “Eight
to five?”
Yes.
“I can’t possibly be here before ten.” Back to texting.
Friends. It’s a new world in which we live. No, she didn’t get
the job. Her parents probably blame affirmative action, or immigrants.
Another person told me about a modern problem in her city.
Seems teenagers (and maybe older) males are flying drones, with cameras, over
back yards and filming girls sunbathing. One lad was caught and offered the excuse
that he had sought after the young lady as a girlfriend and had been rebuffed.
Thought maybe some videos might produce leverage. Or whatever.
I heard about the “developer” that offered to fix a city’s
affordable housing problem with some container crates, probably from Home Depot’s
dumpster site, fitted onto a flat-bet trailer and parked on a site. He assured the Mayor that "tiny homes" were all the rage now in urban planning.
The most common topic was about a phase that seems to be
sweeping the cities in our state. I call it the “Pirate’s Code Problem,” from
the film Pirates of the Caribbean. Remember the response when the heroine invoked
the “Pirate’s Code? “… you must be a pirate for the pirate's code to apply and
you're not. And …, the code is more what you'd call "guidelines" than
actual rules.”
Yes, our cities are facing an increase of conflicts with builders and developers,
mostly the local ones, who consider a city’s adopted regulations more as guidelines than actual rules,
and act accordingly. They are hoping, it seems, for a return to the government of yesteryear,
what I called “regulation by last name.”
I’ve thought about his and have two hypotheses, one negative
and one positive. On the negative end, we are living in a time when those at
the very top of the “governmental food chain” never miss an opportunity to
show their disdain for the rule of law, good government, the general welfare of
the population, or—really—the social stability that comes from common decency. It
would be no wonder that this attitude would trickle down into local government.
I have a more positive hypothesis, borne out by the attitude
of the folks I talked with yesterday. I think we have one of the most educated
and attentive brood of elected officials at the local level in this state that I have seen in
almost a half-century of dealing with municipalities. And they care deeply
about their cities, hence the conflicts with the “dab a little gravel and run”
developers.
If I’m right, look out you demons of darkness. Attitudes and
actions can trickle up as well as down.
Out with the smell of sulfur. Make America smell good again. |
No comments:
Post a Comment