Lot of posts these days talk about how some immigrants have “broken
the law,” and should be punished. There’s something odd about it.
In my opinion, and this is just one person’s, these posts would
carry more weight if they weren’t posted, in almost every instance, by the same
folks who would totally exonerate the woman in Kentucky, who refused to obey a
lawful requirement because of her (a woman with multiple marriages) so-called “religious
beliefs.”
Now, I’m not a biblical scholar, but unlike most evangelicals,
I’ve read the whole Bible, not just the parts that support my embedded beliefs.
It’s tough going and takes you through so many nooks and crannies that forming
a consisted belief system from it is tough without severe selectivity.
My readings have convinced me, though, that there are more requirements
therein for us to love one another, to show mercy on one another, to comfort
the afflicted, to treat aliens well, and to care for the weak and helpless than
there are to keep two men or two women who love one another from engaging in a
lawful wedding.
By lawful, I mean one that has been amended in modern times
from the original biblical allowance for men to have as many wives as they chose,
or for the woman to hold only a supporting and grossly unequal role in the matter.
Geez, if we truly believe that, we wouldn’t even allow our sisters to preach
the Gospel.
Yes, our definitions have changed over the years. By the
time the Galilean came along, there were two people involved in marriage and he
was more vocal about divorce than he was about who the two people were.
He didn’t like it, divorce that is. I haven’t found, though,
where he suggested deportation for the offense.
But back to the law. Yes, certain things are illegal, sexual
harassment being one of those. So far, there hasn’t been a national outcry for
deporting the guilty, quite the contrary in at least one case.
Hiring illegal aliens itself is, well, illegal. I’m trying
to get a count on how many employers have been departed so far for the offense,
but no luck so far.
Hiring contractors and not paying them is, I think, under
certain conditions, illegal. If the one doing the hiring and shafting has enough
legal resources, though, deportation doesn’t follow. Filing bankruptcy seems to
be a cheaper way out for the contractors involved than bringing lawsuits
against billionaires.
Lynching and other forms of murdering African-Americans should
have been illegal at least since shortly after the end of the Civil War. Not
only did our country not make it illegal, we didn’t even deport a single guilty
party. One can probably still smell the cloud of guilt on a hot summer night at
Ninth and Broadway in my city of Little Rock, Arkansas where whites once burned
a black man. A white man in the crowd then publicly directed traffic with a charred
and severed arm. Deported? No. Arrested? No. A local hero? Yes, among many. Do
any of his descendants now post offensive things on Facebook about minorities? In
all likelihood. Acorns don’t fall far from the tree.
A woman recently admitted that she lied when she made
comments that initiated one of our country’s most infamous lynchings, that of a
black child. Has she been deported? Not to my knowledge. Would our country be better
off if she never had lived within its borders? You decide.
I’m not trying to foment divisiveness. I’ll leave that to our
president and his minions. I just choose to follow the path of one who said, “let
him who is without sin cast the first stone.”
I think, if I remember correctly, that same person, it is
written, said, “A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved
you, so you must love one another.” I don’t recall a word therein about our
deporting one another.
Further, I believe that if we have national problems, and we
do, they can be solved better with love than with hatred. I also believe that if
we do have laws, and we must enforce them, we can do so in the least restrictive,
damaging, hurtful, and vengeful way possible. If a person’s church or political
party doesn’t believe that, I have suggestions for that person. I, for one,
think the Galilean would agree.
No comments:
Post a Comment